All posts

Deal Sourcing Data Providers: Databases vs. Enrichment

Deal Sourcing Data Providers: Databases vs. Enrichment

Most investors approach deal sourcing data providers the same way they have for years. They subscribe to PitchBook or Grata. They build lists. Then they struggle to reach the right people.

Here's the problem: those platforms are just the starting point. You're paying for databases, but you're missing the enrichment layer. That's where B2B sellers are miles ahead.

In this post, you'll learn the difference between deal sourcing databases and data enrichment tools. You'll discover why enrichment waterfalls matter. And you'll see how LLM research agents can transform your outreach prep.

Understanding Deal Sourcing Data Providers: Databases vs. Enrichment

First, let's clear up what we're actually talking about.

Deal sourcing databases are platforms like Grata, PitchBook, and Sourcescrub. They give you company lists. You can filter by industry, revenue, location, and funding stage. They're excellent for identifying targets. But they stop there.

Data enrichment is what happens next. It's the process of finding decision-makers at those companies. Then getting their contact information. Then researching each account before you reach out. This is where most investors fall short.

B2B sales teams figured this out years ago. They don't just buy a database and start cold calling. They build enrichment workflows that layer data from multiple sources. The result? Higher response rates and better conversations.

Why Data Enrichment Matters for Deal Sourcing

Your database gives you a company name and basic firmographics. But you can't pitch a company. You need to pitch a person.

That means you need names. Email addresses. LinkedIn profiles. And context about what that person cares about. All of this requires enrichment, not just database access.

Here's what enrichment actually does. It finds the CFO's email when the database doesn't list it. It pulls recent news about the company's expansion plans. It identifies which portfolio companies the founder's connected to. None of that lives in PitchBook.

Without enrichment, you're sending generic outreach to outdated contacts. With it, you're starting conversations that actually matter.

Enrichment Waterfalls: Borrowing from B2B Sales Playbooks

B2B sales teams don't rely on one data source. They build enrichment waterfalls using platforms like Clay.

Here's how it works. Clay connects to multiple data providers in sequence. If the first source doesn't find an email, it tries the second. Then the third. You're not paying for one expensive tool that covers 60% of contacts. You're stacking cheaper tools that together cover 90%.

For investors, this changes everything. You can combine Crunchbase data with Apollo contact info. Add Clearbit for technographics. Layer in LinkedIn signals. All automated in one workflow.

The best part? You're not doing manual research on every prospect. The waterfall handles it. You only review the enriched data before reaching out.

This is exactly what top-performing B2B teams do. It's time investors caught up.

LLM Research Agents: The New Standard for Pre-Outreach Research

Next, let's talk about research quality. Even with good contact data, most investor outreach is generic. That's because manual research doesn't scale.

LLM research agents solve this. These AI-powered tools can research hundreds of companies automatically. They read recent news. They analyze LinkedIn posts. They summarize key business initiatives. Then they output personalized research briefs.

You're not copying and pasting the same pitch anymore. You're referencing specific details that matter to each founder. This is how you cut through the noise.

For deal sourcing data providers, this represents the next evolution. Databases give you targets. Enrichment gives you contacts. LLMs give you context. Together, they're the full stack you need.

Building Your Deal Sourcing Tech Stack

So what does this look like in practice?

Start with your database. Use Grata or PitchBook to build your target list. Export those companies into a tool like Clay.

Then set up your enrichment waterfall. Connect data sources like Apollo, Dropcontact, and Hunter. Let the waterfall find emails and phone numbers automatically.

Finally, add an LLM research agent. Feed it company names and URLs. Have it generate pre-call research for each prospect. Review the output and personalize your outreach accordingly.

This isn't complicated. It's just different from how most investors work today. You're treating deal sourcing like a sales process, because that's what it is.

The Bottom Line

Deal sourcing data providers aren't one thing anymore. You need databases to find companies. You need enrichment to find people. And you need AI to research at scale.

Most investors stop after step one. They subscribe to PitchBook and wonder why response rates stay low. Meanwhile, B2B sellers have figured out that more data sources equal better results.

The good news? These tools are accessible now. Clay costs less than most database subscriptions. LLM APIs are cheap. You don't need a huge budget to build this stack.

You just need to rethink what "deal sourcing data providers" actually means. It's not one platform. It's a workflow that layers multiple tools together. That's how you source deals in 2025.

Ready to industrialize your sourcing?